Search Website
Testimonial

Our university uses nVivo. I can't think why. HyperRESEARCH is much more user friendly.

Denise Goodfellow
Doctoral Student
Australia


Members Login
Members Online
None
Current Poll
What New HyperRESEARCH Feature Do You Want?
 
Home > Support > Read Our FAQ (Questions & Answers) > Can I use source files in languages other than English?

You can use any language that uses the Roman (Latin) alphabet. You can display source files using any font, so source files written in languages that require only a font change can be displayed and used in HyperRESEARCH.

Other languages that use non-Roman alphabets - such as Chinese, Japanese, Arabic, Russian, and others - will require changes to the text engine used in HyperRESEARCH to fully support the Unicode standard. These changes are in active development now, and we look forward to fully supporting work in these languages in an upcoming version of the program.

Last Updated (Wednesday, 31 March 2010 11:25)

 
facebook Visit our company page on Facebook and become a fan! Click here.
In The News
HyperRESEARCH analyzes Adolescents with Learning Disorders

"Self-Efficacy From the Perspective of Adolescents With LD and Their Specialist Teachers" appears in the Journal of Learning Disabilities, Vol. 40, No. 6, pp 494-507 (2007). The authors, Robert M. Klassen (University of Alberta) and Shane L. Lynch (University of Alberta) utilized HyperRESEARCH for their qualitative study of adolescents with learning disorders.

"This study used qualitative methodology to investigate the self-efficacy beliefs of early adolescents with learning disabilities (LD). We conducted a series of focus group interviews with 28 Grade 8 and 9 students with LD and individual interviews with 7 specialist LD teachers. Content analyses of the student and teacher data resulted in 2 a priori and 3 inductive themes: self-efficacy, calibration and levels of self-efficacy, students' self-awareness, attributions for failure, and problems and solutions. The students viewed themselves as low in self-efficacy and generally accurate in the calibration of their efficacy and performance, whereas the teachers viewed the students as overconfident about academic tasks. In contrast to the teachers, the students viewed verbal persuasion as a valued source of self-efficacy. Students attributed their failures to lack of effort, whereas their teachers attributed student failure to uncontrollable deficits. Problems and solutions related to student motivation were discussed from student and teacher perspectives."

Access the article on line here.

Upcoming Event

3 days
left until the next event:
8th International Qualitative Research Conference
on September 06, 2010